FAKTOR-FAKTOR YANG MEMPENGARUHI KINERJA SERTA DAMPAKNYA TERHADAP PRESTASI KERJA APARATUR SIPIL NEGARA DI KABUPATEN BANGKA TENGAH
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to analyze the influence of leadership, organizational culture, organizational communication, motivation, and training on the performance that impacts work performance. Respondents are employees of the secretariat of the district of Central Bangka with a total of 40 people. The method of analysis uses path analysis. The results of the study concluded that there is an influence of leadership variables, organizational culture, organizational communication, motivation, training on the Regional Secretariat of Central Bangka Regency. The recommendations of this study are expected to further enhance the knowledge of leaders in all fields and institutions to provide support and appreciation to improve performance on employee work performance
Downloads
References
[ 2] Alma, Buchari. 2008. Coorporate University. Bandung: Alfabeta
[ 3] Arise Susanti dan Sigit Wahyu Baskoro. 2012. Pengaruh Motivasi Kerja dan Gaya Kepemimpinan Terhadap Disiplin Kerja Serta Dampaknya Pada Kinerja Karyawan (Studi Kasus Pada PT PLN (Persero) APD Semarang. Vol.7 No.2 Universitas Diponegoro Semarang.
[ 4] Benyamin, Alexander. 2014. Execution Leader Kunci Sukses Memimpin Perusahaan. Edisi Pertama. Jakarta: KPG (Kepustakaan Populer Gramedia).
[ 5] Colquit, Jason A., Jeffry A Lepine, dan Machael J Wesson. 2015. Organization Behavior. New York: Mc Graw-hill.
[ 6] Fahmi, 2012. Manajemen Kepemimpinan Teori dan Aplikasi. Bandung: Alfabeta.
[ 7] Ghozali, Imam, 2009. Analisis Multivariat. Semarang: Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro.
[ 8] Handoko, T. Tani. 2012. Manajemen Dalam Berbagai Perspektif. Edisi Pertama. Jakarta: PT. Erlangga.
[ 9] Moeheriono. 2012. Pengukuran Kinerja Berbasis Kompetensi. Jakarta: Rajawali Press.
[ 10] Nawawi. Hadari. 2006. Evaluasi dan Manajemen Kinerja di Lingkungan Perusahaan dan Industri. Yogyakarta: BPFE UGM.
[ 11] Parasuraman, A.et.al. 1994. Reassessment of Expectation as a Comparison Standard in Measuring Service Quality: Implications for Further Research. Journal of Marketing, 58: 111-124.
[ 12] Robbins, P, Stephen. 2009. Organisasi Behavior Edisi ke-12 Buku 2. Alih Bahasa Diana angelica, Ria Cahyani, dan Abdul Rasyid, Salemba Empat, Jakarta.
[ 13] Sandjojo. 2011. Metode Analisis Jalur (Path Analysis) dan Aplikasinya. Jakarta: Sinar Harapan.
[ 14] Schein, Edgar, H (1992). Organization Culture And Leadership. Jossey Bass. Sanfansisco.
[ 15] Sugiyono. 2011. Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.
[ 16] Suharyadi dan Purwoto, S.K. 2009. Statistika Untuk Ekonomi dan Keuangan Modern. Jakarta: Salemba Empat.
[ 17] Sunyoto, Danang. 2012. Manajemen Sumberdaya Manusia. Yogyakarta: CAPS.
[ 18] Terry. G. R (2006). Prinsip-Prinsip Manajemen. Jakarta: PT. Bumi Aksara.
[ 19] Thoha, Miftah. 2012. Perilaku Orgnisasi: Konsep Dasar dan Aplikasinya. Edisi 21. Jakarta: PT. Raja Grafindo Persada.
[ 20] Teas, R. Kenneth. 1994. Expection as Comparison Standart in Measuring Service Quality: An Assesment of Reassesment. Journal of Marketing, 58: 132-139
[ 21] Windy Dyah Indrayani. 2016. Jurnal. Pengaruh Kepemimpinan, Lingkungan Kerja Terhadap Kinerja Karyawan PT Karya Indah Buana Surabaya.
[ 22] Wiyana, Asta DKK, 2016. Jurnal. Pengaruh Kepemimpanan, Lingkungan Kerja, Kompetensi dan Disiplin Kerja Terhadap Kinerja Karyawan PT Karya Indah Buana Surabaya.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
